English Hindi


Prelims Capsule

International Relations

KP Sharma Oli reappointed as Prime Minister of Nepal – Opposition parties failed to muster majority

KP Sharma Oli reappointed as Prime Minister of Nepal – Opposition parties failed to muster majority


  • GS 2 || International Relations || India & itsNeighbours || Nepal

Why in the news?

KP Sharma Oli was reappointed as the Prime Minister of Nepal by President Bidhya Devi Bhandari after the opposition parties failed to put together a coalition government


The ongoing constitutional turmoil in Nepal which includes the dissolution of the lower house by the president with the suggestion of Nepal prime minister K.P. sharmaoli has put the country’s current constitutional situation on question mark as the newly formed constitution of 2015 held that prior to dissolution of lower there should be a caretaker government .

How political turmoil is going to impact the nation as whole?

  • Disturb the national economic balance: Though the country is fighting twin drawback -i.e. the economic drawback once the 2015 earthquake still as this pandemic that is any aggravated by this constitutional turmoil
  • Affect the peoples trust on constitution: Despite the law established within the constitution the current government dissolved the lower house while not cupboard discussion.
  • Lack of trust on organization: The continuing internal conflict within the Oli’s position within the party as president and allegation of corruption could push the individuals towards a trust deficit in political party.
  • Lack of religion in coalition government: The current government that is made with the 2 major party of Asian nation did not assure the political stability within the country inspite of this severe pandemic that once more shows the dearth of maturity inside the coalition government but , this scenario not solely disturbed the inner condition of the country however additionally have an effect on the bilateral relations between India and Asian nation

Effect on the bilateral relations between India and Nepal:

  • Remittance issue: From Asian nation India received per annum nearly three billion greenback as remission which can be pent-up owing to this turmoil
  • Infrastructure project: The continuing Pancheshwar multi model dam project additionally face backlash.
  • Disrupt military relations: The current situation could prevent young people from joining the Indian army.
  • Security concerns: Nepal is strategically important for India, and China’s increasing presence in Nepal as part of the Belt and Road Initiative could make the countries’ relations more vulnerable.
  • Territorial disputes placed on hold: The current territorial conflict between India and Nepal at two strategic points – Limpiyadhura and Kalapani – may have to be put on hold.

In Nepal’s political crisis, there is a tug-of-war between India and China:

  • Nepal is seen as a safety net for both India and China: Beijing sees Nepal as a bulwark against foreign movements aimed at China, while New Delhi sees Nepal as critical to the region’s stability.
  • Attracting New Nepalese Leadership: Given the political crisis in the Himalayan Hindu country, both opposing forces are likely to step up their efforts to ensure that the new leadership is on their side, rather than the enemy’s.
  • Beijing makes no secret of its control over Nepalese leaders, and the current administration is unlikely to back down in ensuring Kathmandu remains an ally and part of its sphere of influence.
  • China is undeniably assertive economically and financially in Nepal, but the majority of its promises, such as transit through Chinese ports and railroad links, are politically motivated.

India’s stand on Nepal’s Political Crisis:

  • India has opted to be more pragmatic and restrained: it is not taking the lead in Nepal as it has in the past, nor is it risking odium for being a spoiler.
    • India is frequently accused of fomenting unrest in the Himalayan nation, but it has now chosen to keep a close eye on the situation from the sidelines.
    • Unlike in 2015, when Nepal’s decision to promulgate the constitution resulted in bad blood and a border blockade, India would allow the crisis to play out further.
  • Nepal’s Political Crisis is “Internal Matter”: India is keeping a close eye on Nepal, where the dissolution of the lower house of parliament is still roiling political waters, while the Chinese ambassador is meeting with top Nepali politicians. India will continue to assist Nepal and its people in moving forward on the path of peace, prosperity, and progress as a neighbor and well-wisher.
  • India has played its cards with caution and dexterity: It let China smear itself into the mud of micromanaging the ruling party’s internal disputes with an assiduously cultivated façade of non-interference.

What can be done in future?

Nepal and India has shared a long time of positive relation to eradicated issues with Nepal and bring the better ties for future:

  • Economic Measures: India needs to be more accommodating in terms of trade and investment. Nepal exports less than $1 billion in goods to India but imports about $8 billion.Despite the fact that economies regulate trade deficits, India can and must take steps to eliminate systemic and bureaucratic barriers to genuine Nepali products entering Indian markets.
    • In order to improve Nepalese exports, India should promote Indian investment in such industries, including hydropower generation.Completing large development projects like the Pancheshwar multipurpose project might be a watershed moment for the two countries.
  • Creating Red Lines: India can strengthen relations with Nepal by resuming discussions on pending contentious issues such as the 1950 treaty, the Kalapani border dispute, and trade and investment difficulties. However, India should be clear about its position, drawing red lines (security concerns raised by China) that Nepal should not cross.
  • Arms Cooperation: Recognizing the armies is critical when it comes to settling border conflicts between the two countries.When India’s economic blockade and the political leadership of both countries were at odds in 2015, the leadership of both armies played a critical role in lifting the blockade and resuming the talks.As a result, strong army diplomacy between the two countries will significantly improve bilateral relations.


Given the lack of significant progress in bilateral relations during this period of instability, India must promote the consolidation of a people-driven polity and raise its public profile. This will only assist India in reclaiming its disputed strategic space.

Mains oriented question:

To counter Chinese influence in Nepal, India must pay attention to the country’s core economic and strategic interests, which moved Nepal toward China in the first place. Discuss in detail. (250 words)