- What is Article 371 of Indian Constitution? Can it solve the Kashmir issue?
- Ministry of Cooperation created by Centre to strengthen Cooperatives
- Assam Cattle Preservation Bill 2021 bans sale of beef in Hindu, Sikh & Jain areas
- Interstate disputes in India and ways to solve them explained, History of formation of Indian States
- Finance Commission recommends Urban Local Bodies empowerment to fight Covid 19
- Great Nicobar Island strategic significance – How India can beat Singapore as a trans-shipment hub?
- Joseph Shine vs Union of India case, Decriminalisation of Adultery
- Shreya Singhal vs Union of India – Freedom of Speech and Expression on the Internet
- Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 challenged in High Court invoking Right to Privacy
- Sarla Mudgal vs Union of India Case – Laws on bigamy in India
- Cinematograph Amendment Bill 2021 by I&B Ministry & its impact on artistic freedom?
Governance & Social Justice
- How Big Tech Companies are challenging Governments around the world? How to regulate Tech Firms?
- Jal Jeevan Mission delivered tap water to more than 1 lakh villages & 71 districts
- World’s largest teachers’ training programme NISHTHA launched by NCERT & MoTA
- What is Ed-Tech?Does India need a new policy for Educational Technology
- UP Population Control Bill 2021, Yogi Govt’s 2 Child Policy
- Five Pillars of Indian Diplomacy for strategic autonomy & global good
- US intervention in Afghanistan – Did USA failed in Afghanistan?
- How can India beat China? Will China’s aging population problem lead to its economic downfall?
- China’s growing presence in Indian Ocean Region a challenge for India?
- Why is China trying to break India’s Chicken Neck? Understand Siliguri Corridor & Doklam through the map
- Zomato and Swiggy indulging in Anti-Competitive Practices alleges NRAI
- How reforms in the Agricultural Sector can transform Indian economy? Issues, Govt schemes & Solutions
- Jet Airways to fly again by the end of year 2021 – Aviation Sector in India
- Paytm IPO to raise Rs 16,000 crore, India’s biggest IPO ever
- How Ports can play a vital role in Indian Economy?
- Agricultural Exports from India are sustainable or not?
- What is Techno Feudalism? How tech giants and pandemic have increased the gap between rich poor
- History of Indian Rupee vs US Dollar – Reasons for devaluation of Indian Rupee since Independence
- Is Uttar Pradesh a rising star? Understand Economic History of UP
Defence & Security
- Armed Forces Special Powers Act explained – Centre extends AFSPA in Nagaland till 31 December 2021
- Jammu Air Base Attack – India at UN said Terrorists using Weaponised Drones needs serious attention
- Will China overtake US and Russia in nuclear weapons arsenal? How China is modernizing its nukes?
- Cross Border Drug Trafficking and Challenges to Internal Security of India
- Father Stan Swamy accused in Elgar Parishad case passed away in custody
- Unlawful Activities Prevention Act ( UAPA ) explained – Why getting bail under UAPA is difficult?
- China launches electric bullet train in Tibet near Arunachal Pradesh
Science & Technology
- GS 3 || Security || Internal Security Threats || Terrorism
Why in the news?
- Father Stan Swamy passed away in a hospital recently and he was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
More in news
- Some social activists were released from a year-long sentence in Delhi. They were charged under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for anti-national activities while protesting for NRC, CAA and NPR. However, many of these activists have raised the concern of misuse of UAPA.
- A total of 1126 cases were registered under UAPA in 2019, a sharp rise from 897 in 2015.
- Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967(also referred as UAPA) has mentioned about unlawful associations, punishment for terrorist activities including defining terrorist act (section 15), offences by companies, forfeiture of proceeds of terrorism or any property intended to be used for terrorism, listing of terrorist organisation under Schedule I of the Act and constituting Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal under section 5 and three Schedule.
- Schedule I-List of Terrorist Organisation.
- Schedule II –International Conventions and Protocols to curb and suppress terrorism.
- Schedule III– It provides security features to define high quality counterfeit Indian currency. notes which include watermark, latent image and see through registration in currency notes.
- Schedule IV– Name of Individuals – Added by 2019 Amendment.
Aim of UAPA
- Central government was considering a stringent law against calls for secession in the mid-1960s. In 1967, the Naxalbari incident imparted a sense of urgency and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was passed in December 1967.
- Law aimed at prevention of unlawful activities associations in India.
- Its main objective was to give powers to central institutions for dealing with activities directed against the integrity and sovereignty of India.
Scope widened over years
- The scope of UAPA 1967 has widened as Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act has been amended multiple times – 2004, 2008, 2012 & 2019.
- Initially, the Act provided for declaring an association or a body of individuals “unlawful” if they indulged in any activity which threatened the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
- In 2004 amendment, many provisions of POTA (Prevention of terrorism act) were added to UAPA after POTA was repealed in 2002.
- In 2008, after the Mumbai attacks it was further strengthened.
- In 2012, UAPA was brought in line with various requirements of the Financial Action Task Force. The ban on organisations was extended to 5 years from the earlier 2 year ban.
- August 2019
- Parliament cleared the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Bill, 2019 to designate individuals as terrorists if the individual commits or participates in acts of terrorism, prepares for terrorism, promotes terrorism or is otherwise involved in terrorism.
Purpose of the 2019 Amendment made to UAPA
- Speedy Investigation
- To facilitate speedy investigation and prosecution of terror offences by empowering National Investigative Agencies (NIA) and designating an individual as terrorist in line with the international practices.
- Prevention of misuse
- Amendment made to UAPA will not be misused against any individual unless individuals including Urban Maoistsengage in terrorist activities against the security and sovereignty of India.
- Empowers NIA- No permission needed from state police in dealing with any particular state case
- Law does not take away powers of the state police. However, when National Investigative Agency (NIA) takes up a case having international and inter-state ramifications, all the facts pertinent to the case are with the NIA, and not with the state police.
- Previously under the 1967 UAPA law, it required that NIA take prior permission from the respective state DGPs to start investigation in terror cases. This delayed the investigation process and allowed the accused to hide their traces or activities.
- The Act empowers the Director General of National Investigation Agency (NIA) to grant approval of seizure or attachment of property when the case is investigated by the said agency.
- The Act also empowers the officers of the NIA, of the rank of Inspector or above, to investigate cases of terrorism in addition to those conducted by the DSP or ACP or above rank officer in the state.
- The Amendment has added another treaty to the list namely The International Convention for Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (2005).
Misuse of the UAPA
- With such high barriers of proof, it is now impossible for an accused to obtain bail, and is in fact a convenient tool to put a person behind bars indefinitely.
- This is being abused by the government, police and prosecution liberally: now, all dissenters are routinely implicated under charges of sedition or criminal conspiracy and under the UAPA.
- In multiple instances, evidence is untenable, sometimes even arguably planted, and generally weak overall.
- But as a consequence of UAPA being applied, the accused cannot even get bail.
- To prevent the misuse, the decision in the Watali case must be urgently reversed or diluted, otherwise, we run the risk of personal liberties being compromised very easily.
- The provision of the act leaves scope for misuse and therefore the judiciary and legislature need to take steps to provide safeguards to prevent the misuse.
Mains model question
- Indian government has strengthened the anti-terrorism laws by amending the unlawful activities (Prevention) act (UAPA), 1967 and the NIA Act. Analyze the changes in the context of the prevailing security environment while discussing the scope and reasons for opposing the UAPA by human rights organizations.