Magazine

English Hindi

Index

100 Expected Questions

Prelims Capsule

Polity

Supreme Court Judgement on Tainted Candidates

Supreme Court Judgement on Tainted Candidates

Relevance:

  • GS 2 || Polity || Political Dynamics || Elections

Why in news?

  • Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, who will be the BJP candidate against Digvijaya Singh of the Congress in the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, has been chargesheeted in the 2008 Malegaon blast case and is currently out on bail. The legal bar on contesting applies only to individuals who have been convicted by a court.

September 2018 Judgment

  • In September 2018, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court said that it was not within its powers to disqualify politicians facing criminal cases from contesting elections.
    • “Though criminalization in politics is a bitter manifest truth, which is a termite to the citadel of democracy, be that as it may, the Court cannot make the law,” the Bench, headed by then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, said. (Public Interest Foundation & Ors vs Union of India & Anr, September 25, 2018)

Background

  • Applications and petitions: The judgment came on a batch of petitions and applications filed by the NGO Public Interest Foundation, former Chief Election Commissioner J M Lyngdoh, the Delhi BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, and others seeking directions to the Election Commission of India to disqualify from elections those candidates against whom charges have been framed in criminal cases.

Recommendations

  • The judicial arm of the State being laden with the duty of being the final arbiter of the Constitution and protector of constitutional ethos cannot usurp the power which it does not have.
  • But the Parliament should bring out a strong law whereby –
    • it is mandatory for the political parties to revoke membership of persons against whom charges are framed in heinous and grievous offences and
    • not to set up such persons in elections, both for the Parliament and the State Assemblies.
  • The court further said this would go a long way in achieving decriminalisation of politics and usher in an era of immaculate, spotless, unsullied and virtuous constitutional democracy.

Way ahead

  • Parliament must make a law to ensure that persons facing serious criminal cases do not enter into the political stream.
    • It is one thing to take cover under the presumption of innocence of the accused but it is equally imperative that persons who enter public life and participate in law making should be above any kind of serious criminal allegation.
  • It is true that false cases are foisted on prospective candidates, but the same can be addressed by the Parliament through appropriate legislation.
  • The nation eagerly waits for such legislation, for the society has a legitimate expectation to be governed by proper constitutional governance.

Mains question

  • Criminalization of politics is a disease that will make our democracy hollow if left unchecked. Discuss the measures implemented to check criminalization of politics and the effectiveness of those measures?